A common and almost always fatal mistake among postgraduate students is to create the admissions package in a hurried way. They spend several months preparing for the GMAT or GRE and only one weekend to write their essays. However, it is naïve to believe that trials are the simplest and fastest part of the process and that on a weekend you can generate successful trials.

The essays are your opportunity to present yourself to the admissions committee, and it is essential to use it to emphasize your differences against other candidates with a score similar to yours, a career or similar average, or similar professional experience. In addition, they are the ideal space to clarify any doubts that the other requirements generate about your possibilities of admission. Essays should also have your personal stamp and voice printed, show your character and your aspirations.

Generating your application for admissions in a hurried way is problematic for several reasons, but especially for the following:

The essay questions do not have a single correct answer.

To write essays that differentiate you from other candidates you need not only to be clear about the skills and experiences that distinguish you, but also to show that you have reflected on the specific questions in the admissions application. To achieve this, choose the stories that not only present you in a better light, but also demonstrate maturity, depth, self-knowledge and reflection. When you prepare several drafts in time, it is common to modify the story you selected initially by remembering after writing the first draft a better anecdote to illustrate the skill, passion or experience you want to exemplify. The process to develop your narrative: the thread that unites your entire application, the light under which you want the admissions committee to know you, can and should change as a result of your reflection with the questions or themes of the essays. If you develop your application in a hurried way, you lose the opportunity to improve it and you run the great risk of delivering something incomplete or that fails to project you in the best way.

Identifying the best response according to your profile or narrative requires a process of introspection and reflection on the themes of the essays.
The topics or questions of the essays are personal. The admissions committee wants to know about you, what moves you as a person, and why you will be not only a good student, but a good classmate. For example, one of the essays to apply for admission to the Stanford MBA asks you to answer the following question: what is most important to you and why? The Stanford MBA supports 7% of applicants. This question, which can make or break your possibility of admission, deserves that you spend more than a weekend. Moreover, it is very likely that students who will be arriving at the Californian campus in August have thought long and hard about how to adequately answer this question. Another frequently asked question on admission applications is asking you to tell the admissions committee something about yourself that will surprise the rest of your classmates. This question seeks to know another facet of your profile, an aspect that can not be clearly evaluated with your resume, grades, letters of recommendation or scores on the exam. Choosing the right anecdote, of the many that you can have in mind, to distinguish yourself positively from the thousands of other applicants is not a simple matter.

Creating a request in time allows you to correct the course, and in case it is necessary to generate better stories to narrate in the essays.
Another problematic aspect of writing essays on a weekend is that you do not give yourself the opportunity to generate better stories and you are forced to talk only about what you have when you start writing. In order to answer a question convincingly it is necessary to provide concrete examples. You can not talk about your passions and goals as if they were only future projects, you must show with your past and present actions that you are not building castles in the air, and that your words are consistent with your actions. There is no better way to convince the admissions committee of your potential than with concrete examples that show that potential. Believing that you will not need to at least “tune” your profile is unrealistic; Especially taking into account that your competition, the postulants of other cultures, have been preparing their application several years in advance. You should also know that several of the applicants who will be your competition are prepared with Scholastica and have spent months working with guidance and strategically to generate concrete examples and stories that allow them to submit a competitive request and present their case in the best light.

If you write your essays on a weekend, you will hardly have time to analyze your application in a comprehensive way.
Admissions committees not only see your essays, they also read your recommendation letters, evaluate your GRE or GMAT and TOEFL scores, know your qualifications and analyze your professional experience. They do not interpret admission requirements independently: it is the set of these that in the aggregate give them a holistic image of each applicant. Do not make the serious mistake of considering the requirements of your application in isolation. By writing the essays in a hurry and in a single weekend, you miss the opportunity to generate a conversation between the different requirements, for example feedback with the information and perspectives of your letters of recommendation and your resume. The vast majority of applications fall because they raise doubts to the admissions committee. Doubts can be avoided if instead of working independently with each one the requirements, you understand that these are the pieces of the same puzzle and that your application is not complete until you join the pieces and evaluate the already armed puzzle.

There are consultancies that either demonstrate a deep ignorance of the process of admissions or taking advantage of the ignorance of the students about the process, they give consultancies to develop the tests of admission in a weekend. They charge their advice as if they were giving an elite service and the students who hire them, deceived by the propaganda, pay a lot of money for a hurried and incomplete guide that in fact will not help them to obtain what they need: the letter of acceptance to the University of your Dreams.

To get really useful advice that distinguishes you from your competition, it is essential not only that the consultant knows the admissions process and the universities, but that you know. Generating the narrative (the thread that links a successful application or the image that projects from you through all the pieces of the puzzle) takes time, and several meetings. Rehearsals demand self-knowledge and introspection, the least that should have those who seek to help you is the time to know you, to identify and evaluate the stories, anecdotes, aspirations or aspects of your personality that should be emphasized in your essays. This knowledge must go beyond what you can say about yourself in an express meeting.

Remember also that the admissions process is comprehensive. Advising you about your essays without knowing the other requirements or even offering you recommendations on how to improve the other requirements to support what you write in the essays, gives me a myopic and outdated view of your profile, which in the best of cases generates Confusion, and at worst, suspicions. Therefore, it may be counterproductive to work with someone on a trial basis independently and independently, without regard to the rest of your application.

Also try a new kind of MBA essay writing service on ThePensters.

Finally, you must understand the admissions process as a process, and not lose sight of the reason you are taking it (and you are paying for counseling): to be accepted. It is quite usual for a good candidate who did not devote the time or had no guidance on how to prepare their process, not when applying a great candidate; But with a strategic guide that allows you to refine your profile, you can not only enter your target program, but even a better program. If you work with someone who dedicates you only one weekend and their deliverables are limited, this person has no incentive to help you decide in a more informed way what is best for you: apply now (with the assumption of acceptance) ) To a smaller caliber program, or apply with time (and be accepted) to a better program. Working only one weekend creates a conflict of interest, your advisor wants you to apply as soon as possible (that weekend), and therefore apply with what you already have (whether you are accepted or not for him Something circumstantial). You on your part want to be accepted and you must be willing to refine your profile to increase your chances of admission to the best programs.

Back to Top